<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Omitted scenes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.todayiwrite.com/journal/omitted-scenes.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.todayiwrite.com/journal/omitted-scenes.html</link>
	<description>(the psychology of writer's block)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 18:35:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: momo</title>
		<link>http://www.todayiwrite.com/journal/omitted-scenes.html/comment-page-1#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>momo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 17:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.todayiwrite.com/omitted-scenes.html#comment-62</guid>
		<description>.. but how do you KNOW something was omitted in someone else&#039;s published work??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>.. but how do you KNOW something was omitted in someone else&#8217;s published work??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Today I Write : Master and Commander, again</title>
		<link>http://www.todayiwrite.com/journal/omitted-scenes.html/comment-page-1#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Today I Write : Master and Commander, again</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 23:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.todayiwrite.com/omitted-scenes.html#comment-60</guid>
		<description>[...] Now here&#8217;s a coincidence, even a synchronicity.  Just yesterday I was telling you about Patrick O&#8217;Brian, in a long aside to what I was really trying to say about whether authors can just omit troublesome scenes. It was so long and so half-relevant that I actually wondered if I should just omit it. And today, in a quiet moment between clients, I came across this thought, which I&#8217;m quite sure is O&#8217;Brian&#8217;s own, in the mouths of two of his regular characters: &#8220;Are endings really so very important? Sterne did quite well without one; and often an unfinished picture is all the more interesting for the bare canvas&#8230; The conventional ending, with virtue rewarded and losses ends tied up is often sadly chilling; and its platitude and falsity tend to infect what has gone before, however excellent.  Many books would be far better without their last chapter: or at least with no more than a brief, cool, unemotional statement of the outcome.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Now here&#8217;s a coincidence, even a synchronicity.  Just yesterday I was telling you about Patrick O&#8217;Brian, in a long aside to what I was really trying to say about whether authors can just omit troublesome scenes. It was so long and so half-relevant that I actually wondered if I should just omit it. And today, in a quiet moment between clients, I came across this thought, which I&#8217;m quite sure is O&#8217;Brian&#8217;s own, in the mouths of two of his regular characters: &#8220;Are endings really so very important? Sterne did quite well without one; and often an unfinished picture is all the more interesting for the bare canvas&#8230; The conventional ending, with virtue rewarded and losses ends tied up is often sadly chilling; and its platitude and falsity tend to infect what has gone before, however excellent.  Many books would be far better without their last chapter: or at least with no more than a brief, cool, unemotional statement of the outcome.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

